Cases 1 - 10 of 31
PETERSON v. ACCHIONE et al
as 2:2024cv04347
Plaintiff:
LEVAUNT PETERSON
Defendant:
K. ACCHIONE and S.C.O. M. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holton v. Houston et al
as 5:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
Lyle Holton
Defendant:
Lt. Houston, S.C.O. Diro, Cpt. Munsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lojo v. Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv04260
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pena Lojo
Defendant:
CO LOPEZ, HARVEY, Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HADDEN v. HERSHEY et al
as 1:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE M HADDEN
Defendant:
RICHARD HERSHEY, JEFFREY LORMAN, ALISON AKKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2021cv14577
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O L. BYRD, SERGEANT PEER and CAPTAIN T. BLANQO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William DeCory v. Ashley Stabe, et al
as 21-1775
Defendant / Appellee:
Ashley Stabe, SD DOC Sgt; in her individual capacity, Nicolas Anderson, S.C.O. in his individual capacity, South Dakota Department of Corrections, in its official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Martin Ardene DeCory
Lindsey v. Fowler et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
NFN Halabeston, Larry Fowler, S.C.O. NFN Rackclift and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv05962
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., CVS HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JONES and GAYLA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POLYNICE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv16875
Plaintiff:
EDWIN POLYNICE
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOES 1-10, S.C.O. JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. GAYLES et al
as 2:2019cv12278
Defendant:
S.C.O. BRITO, SCO MORALES, SCO EMI and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
