Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Renfro et al v. Jennings et al
as 6:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Margie M. Renfro, Christopher Renfro and Arnie Bell Jennings
Defendant:
Delbert Joseph Jennings, Kimberely Jennings, Sarah Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
as 22-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD and others
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36841
Plaintiff:
SARAH HARPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKEY et al v. ARDIS
as 3:2017cv00944
Defendant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Plaintiff:
DARLENE DICKEY and SARAH HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
