Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez-Ochoa v. USA
as 5:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Saul Martinez-Ochoa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03226
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN SAUL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACKERMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ACKERMAN, JORGE IBRAIN ADRIAN, JOSE DIMAS ALFARO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Martinez-Palmero v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02763
Petitioner:
Saul Martinez-Palmero
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saul Martinez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Saul Martinez
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Deputy Lomeli, Deputy Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marco CastanedaIn re: Marco Castaneda
as 22-5120
Petitioner:
In re: MARCO ANTONIO CRUZ CASTANEDA, aka Saul Martinez, aka Marco Antonio Cruz, aka Antonio Cruz
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
