Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HILL v. BORGES et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELVIS HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES, RDC RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and SCOTT BLACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Bartow County Georgia et al
as 4:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray West
Defendant:
Bartow County Georgia, City of Emerson Georgia, Bryson Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles et al v. Mayton et al
as 4:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Elliot Stoney Bowles and Ellen Starlene Dodd
Defendant:
Mark Mayton, John Leslie Cheek, Alious Scott Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Gooch, et al v. Jonathan Shirley, et al
as 13-15709
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS L. GOOCH and SUSAN J. GOOCH, as Next Friends of J.W.C. and J.P.G., Minor Children of Yvonne Hollis Gooch, Deceased, and as Co-Administrators of the the Estate of Yvonne Hollis Gooch
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN SHIRLEY, JEREMY WOODY, SCOTT BLACKMAN and others
Moshen Omar v. Scott Blackman, et al
as 13-4542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSHEN OMAR
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT BLACKMAN, Former Acting District Director Philadelphia District US Immigration and Naturalization Service
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
CHARLES COBBS, US Department of Homeland Security Boston District, KENNETH ELWOOD, Former Acting District Director Philadelphia District US Immigration and Naturalization Service, STEVEN FARQUHARSON, District Director Boston District US Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Gooch et al v. Millsap et al
as 4:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Gooch and Susan J. Gooch
Defendant:
Clark Millsap, The City of Cartersville , Brian Earick and others
Sahota et al v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv02207
Petitioner:
Kamaldeep Sahota and Majit Mehmi
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey and Scott Blackman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
