Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Michelle Osborne v. Tracy Police Department, et al
as 21-16411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE OSBORNE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSE CALVACHE, BRETT HICKS and others
Bernhard et al v. City of Tracy et al
as 2:2020cv02353
Plaintiff:
Randy Blake Bernhard and Roxane Pilar Bernhard
Defendant:
Willhurst, Jarrod Jesser, Richard Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS)Osborne v. Calvache et al
as 2:2020cv02341
Defendant:
Maria Quiros, Steve Clayton, Mckenna Stevenson Umpad and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Osborne v. Tracy Police Dept et al
as 2:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Maria Quiros, Steve Clayton, Crystal Sheivin and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendez v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Heather Buchanan, Joseph Hodges, Shawn Steiger and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bona v. Berkshire Hills Regional School District et al
as 3:2016cv30104
Plaintiff:
Maggie Bona
Defendant:
Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Scott Muir, Donna Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVO et al v. RADIANCY INC . et al
as 1:2015cv01926
Plaintiff:
YESENIA OLIVO , SCOTT MUIR , KENDLLENA KURDI and others
Defendant:
RADIANCY INC and DOLEV RAFAELI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olivo et al v. Radiancy, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv06281
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Olivo , Scott Muir , Kendllena Kurdi and others
Defendant:
Radiancy, Inc. and Dolev Rafaeli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muir v. Stockbridge, Town of et al
as 3:2014cv30092
Plaintiff:
Scott Muir
Defendant:
Stockbridge, Town of and Stephen Shatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muir et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01706
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Muir and Scott Muir
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
