Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Peters v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv03082
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
K Butler, Dr Trost and Wexford Health Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2016cv00135
Petitioner:
Scott Peter Gabriel
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13863
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters and Patricia Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallagher et al v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gallagher, John P. Laurange, Scott Peters and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Christopher Kunkle, Maureen A. Bosco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. McHenry County Connections Officers et al
as 1:2015cv07236
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
McHenry County Connections Officers, Ross, Hinsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiss v. NNN Capital Fund I, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02689
Plaintiff:
John L. Weiss
Defendant:
NNN Capital Fund I, LLC, Torrey Pines Bank, Scott Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julian v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Scott Peter Julian
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HANEY et al v. PETERS-FRANTOM
as 2:2014cv02001
Plaintiff:
CECELIA G. HANEY and PATRICK DARPLAH
Defendant:
JARIN SCOTT PETERS-FRANTOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETERS v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Petitioner:
ANDREW SCOTT PETERS
Respondent:
GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv06317
Plaintiff:
Scott Peter Harris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
