Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RICKARD v. BRANDI et al
as 2:2026cv00235
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RICKARD
Defendant:
BRANDI and ROB FARLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Linden v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 22-1681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD T. LINDEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timesha Beauchamp
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, MICHAEL STORMS, SCOTT RICKARD and others
Halperin v. Boerner et al
as 3:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Rickard, John J. Heller, Brandley and others
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Halperin and Alan D Halperin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lattimore, Guardian et al v. City of Southfield et al
as 2:2020cv12738
Defendant:
Phillip Mulligan, Jake Kroll, Scott Rickard and others
Plaintiff:
Timesha Beauchamp, incapacitated person and Erika Lattimore, Guardian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spears, Next Friend et al v. City of Southfield et al
as 2:2020cv12736
Defendant:
Phillip Mulligan, Jake Kroll, Scott Rickard and others
Plaintiff:
Timesha Beauchamp, an incapacitated person and Savannah Spears, Next Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storms et al v. Oakland County Medical Control Authority et al
as 4:2020cv12457
Defendant:
Scott Minaudo, Doctor Doe 1, Sebrina Kerr and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Storms, Jake Kroll, Phillip Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RICKARD v. WEXFORD MEDICAL et al
as 2:2017cv00259
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, KIM HOBSON, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICE AND HEALTH CARE DIVISION and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICKARD v. CORIZON HEALTH CARE et al
as 2:2016cv00438
Defendant:
BRYAN BULLER, TINA BURGER, CAROLYN and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
