Cases 11 - 20 of 131
WILLIAMSON et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON, ANTONIO BUNDY and NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, ERIN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB et al
as 3:2023cv16713
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01933
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CAMMARATA v. THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) et al
as 2:2022cv04645
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMMARATA
Defendant:
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC), JOHN V. DONNELLY III, ESQ., DUSTIN RUTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARMER-SHAW v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN FARMER-SHAW
Defendant:
FORMER SEC JOHN WETZEL, FOMER SUPT CLARK, SUPT OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
