Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Knapp et al
as 1:2026cv00748
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Defendant:
Thomas Leroy Knapp and Shannon Thomas Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
THOMAS et al v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2026cv00977
Plaintiff:
SHANNON THOMAS and YAPHET GORDON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE RUBENS MOREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, et al.
as 25-2071
Plaintiff:
ANDREA DAWN GEORGE, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION, RODNEY CAWSTON, ANDREW JOSEPH, JR. and others
George v. Jursek et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Defendant:
Jason D'Avignon, Marty Raap, Alice Koskela and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
George v. Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 5:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 9:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pitts v. Unknown Defendants
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer Derry and FCI Seagoville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
