Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lee v. People of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Rivaughn Lee
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois, Ruben Brandon, Shawn Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. BERDNIK et al
as 2:2021cv09947
Defendant:
MR. SHAWN TURNER and RICHARD H. BERDNIK
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLAN DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv03665
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Shawn Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv04304
Plaintiff:
Lance Turner, Brandon, Jason and others
Defendant:
Vincent Thompson, Shawn Turner and James Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Slaughter, et al v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 16-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON, DANIEL STRYKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, Governor, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of NJ Senate, VINCENT PRIETO, Speaker of NJ Assembly and others
Turner v. Duffield et al
as 1:2016cv00739
Plaintiff:
Shawn Turner
Defendant:
Nikki Duffield, Murphy, Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLAUGHTER et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv08327
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER, THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, STEPHEN SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Cartledge
as 3:2011cv01789
Petitioner:
Derrick Shawn Turner
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Christopher Turner
as 08-56613
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN TURNER
Turner v. Boyle
as 2:2008cv00372
Plaintiff:
Shawn Turner
Defendant:
Jennifer Boyle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
