Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SHUMPERT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
REGINALD L. SHUMPERT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shumpert v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13192
Defendant:
Rhonda Shumpert, L'Oreal USA, Inc, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Elizabeth W. Canelas, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiles et al v. Champagne et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shirley Berger, Captain David Hicks, Dr Eugene P Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Dolgner, Devon Shumpert, Antonio McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles, Nicasio et al v. Champagne, Quala et al
as 3:2020cv01128
Defendant:
David Hicks, Dr. Eugene P. Burke, Maria Silao-Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Dolgner, Devon Shumpert, Antonio McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brusaw v. Simpi-Mensah et al
as 1:2019cv03478
Defendant:
Regina Martin, Kimberly Shumpert, Patricia Loparco and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Brusaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Maas et al
as 1:2018cv02729
Plaintiff:
Jose L Sanchez
Defendant:
Robert Maas, Jessica Emily Nawrocki, Jennifer Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Kolodziej et al
as 1:2016cv01137
Plaintiff:
Mansour Mohammad
Defendant:
Officer Kolodziej, Officer Evans, Officer Ogaldez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett Shumpert v. USA
as 12-3277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT D. SHUMPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shumpert v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv06026
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
