Cases 1 - 10 of 48
In Re Norfolk Southern Corporation Bond/Note Securities Litigation
as 1:2023cv04068
Plaintiff:
Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund and City of Pontiac Reestablished General Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mex, et al v. Anthony Earley, Jr., et al
as 22-16711
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PG&E CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO, The Class, YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY F. EARLEY, Jr., GEISHA J. WILLIAMS, NICKOLAS STAVROPOULOS and others
Defendant:
PG&E CORPORATION
Boston Retirement System, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-80076
Respondent:
BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DAVID MESSINGER, ELLIE MARIE TORONTO ESA and others
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, NELSON CHAI and others
Messinger et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08610
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Ryan Graves, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Messinger, Joseph Cianci, Irving S. Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv03785
Defendant:
K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Owens and CalPERS
Petitioner:
IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS, The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and others
Interested Party:
Partners for Progress Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management Company (LUX), S.a.r.l and others
Special Master:
Shawn K Judge
Stirratt v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06361
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Ryan Graves, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stirratt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Aberdeen City Council v. Under Armour, Incorporated
as 19-2032
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, PNC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, BYRON K. ADAMS, JR. and others
Defendant:
BRAD DICKERSON and ANTHONY W. DEERING
Plaintiff:
MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, BEN STENGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, BRIAN BREECE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL, as Administrating Authority for the North East Scotland Pension Fund and BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DENT, BERNARDO MEDELLIN, SACRAMENTO CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund et al v. Rambo et al
as 5:2019cv00994
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Lebenthal & Co., LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund, York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund and City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In Re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation
as 5:2018cv03509
Defendant:
Jason P. Wells, David S. Thomason, Christopher P. Johns and others
Plaintiff:
David C. Weston, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
Ron Williams
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Appellee:
Official Committee of Tort Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
