Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
as 1:2023cv11339
Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company
Defendant: Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Type: Contract Insurance
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Indian Pond Country Club, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10286
Counter Defendant: Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Counter Claimant: Indian Pond Country Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00223
Defendant: CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff: BlueChoice HealthPlan of South Carolina, Inc., CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 20-1781
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Ramirez-Fort v. MUSC, et al
as 20-1563
Defendant / Appellee: ROCKNE HYMEL, a/k/a Pimp Daddy's Chief Resident, DIANA MULLIS, JENNIFER L. HARPER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIGDALIA RAMIREZ-FORT
DONAHUE v. JONES & WILSON REALTY LLC et al
as 1:2020cv11052
Defendant: JONES & WILSON REALTY LLC, SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA and PAT McANIFF PAINTING/ROOF COATINGS
Plaintiff: MICAH DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Tocco v. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
as 1:2019cv00462
Plaintiff: Stephen Tocco
Defendant: Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?