Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Changing World Films LLC et al v. Nathaniel Parker et al
as 2:2022cv09021
Plaintiff:
Changing World Films LLC, Selton Shaw and Langston Shaw
Defendant:
Nathaniel Parker, TM Film Finance LLC, Tiny Giant Productions, LLC d/b/a Tiny Giant Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CHANGING THE WORLD FILMS, LLC et al v. PARKER et al
as 1:2021cv02787
Defendant:
NATHANIEL PARKER, SHELTON JACKSON LEE, NATE PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
CHANGING THE WORLD FILMS, LLC, SELTON SHAW and LANGSTON SHAW
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Williams v. Amazon Studios, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11739
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc., Viacom Inc., Forty Acres and a Mule and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Williams
Akinlemibola v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2017cv03472
Plaintiff:
Grace Akinlemibola
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Michael Rendina, Ginger Ostro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akinlemibola v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2017cv03174
Plaintiff:
Grace Akinlemibola
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Michael Rendina, Ginger Ostro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Lee
as 6:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Elaine McClain and David McClain
Defendant:
Shelton J. (Spike) Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jonathan Riches v. Spike Lee
as 08-7380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
JEFRI AALMUHAMMED, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SPIKE LEE and FREDDIE KLEIN
Riches et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Jefri Aalmuhammed and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Spike Lee and Freddie Klein
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Forty Acres and a Mule Filmworks, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Lee White, III
Defendant:
Forty Acres and a Mule Filmworks, Inc., Showtime Networks, Inc., CBS Viacom and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
