Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Morris v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Delvin M Morris
Defendant:
Joseph Spurlock, Justine Minor, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Queen et al
as 1:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Edward Thurman
Defendant:
Queen , Downing and Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gillaspie et al
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Glyn D Williams
Defendant:
Rick Gillaspie, David White, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Gatewood et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stanley Burke
Defendant:
Gatewood, Wendy Kelley, Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Kiesling, et al v. Ross Spurlock
as 16-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Christopher Kiesling and Katy Kiesling
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Individually, and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pulaski County, AR, Mark Swagerty, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Pulaski County Sheriff Deputy, Cardarious Walker, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Pulaski County Sheriff Deputy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ross Spurlock, in his individual capacity only
Kiesling et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kiesling and Katy Kiesling
Defendant:
Doc Holladay , Mark Swagerty , Cardarious Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cruthis v. Vision's et al
as 4:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Keyli Cruthis and Cortny Spurlock
Defendant:
Vision's, Minor Booth, William Marfoglio and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spurlock v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv03209
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
