Cases 41 - 50 of 177
Spurlock v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Spurlock
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mack Arthur Foreman, Jr and Mack Auther Foreman, Jr
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock and Cliff Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin-Bradley v. Laurel County, KY et al
as 6:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kewan D. Conklin-Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY, Edith Hensley, Michelle Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipple v. Jessica, et al
as 6:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Laurel County, Edith Hacker, Jamie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipple v. Jessica
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Laurel County, Edith Hacker, Jamie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyd v. Spurlock et al
as 6:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Michelle Spurlock and Edith Hacker
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Ivey et al
as 1:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2021cv01204
Plaintiff:
James Patton
Defendant:
Tony Spurlock and Kieth Penry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
