Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rhonda Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton II, and in her own right
Defendant / Appellee:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, TA East Penn Refractories, AO SMITH CORP and others
Defendant:
FOSECO INC, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO and others
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
United States of America v. Westinghouse Mining Circuit Breaker et al
as 5:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Square D Co. Size 2 Starter, Size 3 Starter, Two (2) Eaton 1000 VAC Mining Breakers and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Richard Averson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Westinghouse Mining Circuit Breaker et al
as 5:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Square D Co. Size 2 Starter, Size 3 Starter, Two (2) Eaton 1000 VAC Mining Breakers and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Freddie Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gibson v. ViacomCBS Inc.
as 1:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Grinnell LLC, ViacomCBS Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant:
BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 15-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY SPYCHALLA, Individually and As Special Administrator of the Estate of Leonard J. Spychalla, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
AVCO CORP, ALLISON ENGINE CO, BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS INC and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
