Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified: BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Hurt v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2015mc00061
Petitioner: Tyrone Hurt
Respondent: The State of Alabama, The State of Alabama Legislative Body and International Criminal Court
United States of America, et al v. Mims Management Group, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00907
Plaintiff: United States of America , The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mims Management Group, LLC, Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC, Northeast Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
PHELPS v. TOURTELLOT et al
as 1:2014cv00844
Plaintiff: CALVIN A PHELPS
Defendant: PETER TOURTELLOT, JOHN NORTHEN, MICHAEL MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
as 14-1945
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN E. FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland, WILLIAM M, PALLOZZI, Colonel (pty), Colonel, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of State Police and Superintendent of the Maryland State Police, DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WINK'S SPORTING GOODS, INCORPORATED, ASSOCIATED GUN CLUBS OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED, ATLANTIC GUNS, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW W. TURNER, SHAWN J. TARDY and MATTHEW GODWIN
David King v. Sylvia Burwell
as 14-1158
Amicus Curiae: THE GALEN INSTITUTE, AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, JONATHAN H. ADLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSE LUCK, BRENDA LEVY, DAVID KING and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN KOSKINEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Chandler v. State of Alabama
as 3:2012cv00044
Petitioner: Eddie Michael Chandler
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Woollard v. Denis Gallagher
as 12-1437
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARCUS L. BROWN, DENIS GALLAGHER, CHARLES M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: RAYMOND WOOLLARD and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant: TERRENCE SHERIDAN
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Fisher We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv02245
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility LLC
Defendant: Lara Fisher
Amicu: Communication Workers of America
Movant: State of Utah, State of Alabama, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?