Cases 31 - 40 of 4,008
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce Henry v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, et al
as 24-10139
Plaintiff:
BRUCE HENRY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, SHERIFF OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1050
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
George v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dangelo Laquez Brown
Defendant:
Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Pathway Group Home, Journey Group Home Growth Develop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy Minnifield v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-10083
Petitioner:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Neil WalkerIn re: Neil Walker
as 24-10597
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
