Cases 51 - 60 of 893
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Atryzek v. Neronha
as 23-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEBASTIAN W. ATRYZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER F. NERONHA, in his individual and official capacity as Rhode Island Attorney General, RHODE ISLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, in their individual and official capacity, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in their individual and official capacity and others
Kristin Worth, et al v. Bob Jacobson
as 23-2248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kristin Worth, Austin Dye, Axel Anderson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Bob Jacobson, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Defendant:
Kyle Burton, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mille Lacs County, Minnesota, Dan Starry, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Washington County, Minnesota and Troy Wolbersen, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Douglas County, Minnesota
Appellant:
Everytown for Gun Safety, formerly known as Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, United States, State of Illinois and others
McCullough v. Tavares et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
John L. McCullough, III
Defendant:
Officer Flavio Tavares, State of Rhode Island, City of Providence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Munir v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Hasim Munir
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and Paul A Suttell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky et al v. Labrador et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Caitlin Gustafson and Darin Weyhrich
Defendant:
Raul Labrador, Members of the Idaho State Board of Medicine, Idaho State Board of Nursing and others
Amicus Curiae:
St. Luke's Health System Ltd., State of Arizona, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Swiridowsky v. Wall, et al
as 23-1319
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SWIRIDOWSKY
Respondent / Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
