Cases 11 - 20 of 46
DUKES v. WOOD et al
as 2:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUKES
Defendant:
E.M.S.A. HSA STEPHANIE WOOD and MEDICAL PROVIDER RACHEL MEDLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOOD v. CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA
as 2:2021cv00113
Defendant:
CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA doing business as WALDOBORO CHIROPRACTIC & SPA PA doing business as WALDOBORO CHIROPRACTIC & MASSAGE
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL OFFICE, SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY and others
Petitioner:
ACEY REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GOODMAN v. MICELI et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, BETH RUDZIEMSKI, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE I. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IN RE:STUBHUB REFUND LITIGATION
as 4:2020md02951
Plaintiff:
Matthew McMillan, Stephanie Wood, Michelle Kopfmann and others
In Re:
IN RE:STUBHUB REFUND LITIGATION
Defendant:
Last Minute Transaction, Inc. and StubHub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. StubHub, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04125
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Wood
Defendant:
StubHub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Fergerson et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Amy, Dian Fergerson, Jason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. SMYTH et al
as 2:2020cv00519
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. DENISE SMYTH, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jerome Washington v. Superintendent Gilmore, et al
as 19-3808
Defendant / Appellee:
CHCA NICHOLSON, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, BSN MBA, CCHP, PA-C HAMMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
