Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tabb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04824
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Tabb, Carter Slusher, Anthony Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Stephen Smith v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2009
Petitioner:
STEPHEN SMITH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Michael Benson v. High Road Operating, LLC
as 22-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BENSON, KRISTEN BENSON, SCOTT BLASS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HIGH ROAD OPERATING, LLC
Smith et al v. Dollar Tree Stores
as 8:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith and Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Benson et al v. High Road Operating, LLC
as 5:2020cv00229
Plaintiff:
Mary Caldwell, William Robinson, Matthew Schmitt and others
Defendant:
High Road Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chisholm et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03383
Plaintiff:
Anthony Espinosa, Renate Lawson, Jo Ann Smith and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mingus et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Anna Lee Mingus
Defendant:
Ethan Taylor Smith and Linton Stephen Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13496
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith and Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Integral Consulting Services, Inc
as 8:2014cv03094
Plaintiff:
Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Integral Consulting Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
