Cases 1 - 10 of 156
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 22-35455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent, JULIE MARTIN, KECIA L. RONGEN and others
Michael Hudson, Jr. v. Steve Sinclaire, et al
as 21-35868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SAMUEL HUDSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SINCLAIRE, DOC Secretary (currently retired), ROBERT HERZOG, Assistant Secretary - Prison Division, DANIELLE ARMBRUSTER, Assistant Secretary - Reentry Division and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 21-35674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent, JULIE MARTIN, KECIA L. RONGEN and others
Kinney v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2021cv05032
Defendant:
Hugo Reyes, Deborah Tonifer, James Key and others
Plaintiff:
James A Kinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Luis v. Sinclair
as 2:2020cv01611
Respondent:
Steve Sinclair
Petitioner:
Alberto Martinez-Luis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Ulloa Martinez v. Steve Sinclair
as 20-73089
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO ULLOA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
STEVE SINCLAIR
John Demos, Jr. v. Jeffrey Epstein
as 19-7599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR., a/k/a Abar
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK RUBIO, Politician/Fixer/Keeper of Secrets, DONALD HOLBROOK, Prison Superintendent, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Deceased and others
Demos v. Holbrook et al
as 2:2019cv01735
Defendant:
Katrina Suckow, David Lesser, Lynn Clark and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Epstein et al
as 3:2019cv00643
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Mark Rubio, Robert Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Inslee et al
as 3:2018cv05929
Plaintiff:
William Martin
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Jeff Uttecht, Jerry Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
