Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KASAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
HELEN KASAY and HELEN A. KASAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JAMES WALKER, INEZ SAKI-TAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORMLY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GORMLY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INEZ SAKI-TAY, JAMES WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Carver v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al.
as 1:2018cv00164
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Kori L. Beck, The Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Anderson Carver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. King et al
as 1:2018cv10325
Defendant:
Rev. Raleigh Tammell, Bruce S. Gordon, Yvonne White and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jerome Radford, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06657
Plaintiff:
Steven Allen
Defendant:
P.O. Heather Vobis, Shield No. 8755, P.O. John Doe and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ever Perez v. Richard Gamez, et al
as 14-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVER PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TROOPER RICHARD GAMEZ, OFFICER ANDREW RICHARD CRONE, BRIAN HUNTER and others
Perez v. Gamez et al
as 1:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Ever Perez
Defendant:
Trooper Richard Gamez, Officer Andrew Richard Crone, Brian Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
