Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Echeverria Sagastume v. Fazal Development Network, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04653
Plaintiff:
Oscar Giovany Echeverria Sagastume
Defendant:
Fazal Development Network, Inc. , Murad Fazal and Feroz Fazal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sagastume-Martinez v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2015cv05382
Plaintiff:
Elvys Sagastume-Martinez
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sagastume v. Del Monte Fresh Produce (West Coast), Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv04350
Defendant:
Del Monte Fresh Produce (West Coast), Inc. , Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. and Tricont Trucking Company
Plaintiff:
Ronis Sagastume
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Manuel De Jesus Sagastume v. Attorney General United State
as 15-1783
Petitioner:
MANUEL DE JESUS SAGASTUME
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Jorge Sagastume
as 15-4150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE NOEL SAGASTUME, a/k/a Jorge Noel Sagastume-Perez
Sagastume v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 8:2014cv02712
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Sagastume
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sagastume v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sagastume
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association and NexBank SSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Maria Ramirez Sagastume, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71411
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RAMIREZ SAGASTUME and OSCAR ROJAS RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
SAGASTUME et al v. KELLY et al
as 2:2012cv05536
Plaintiff:
ANA V. SAGASTUME and BYRON SAGASTUME
Defendant:
ROGER E. KELLY , R.F. CHAMBERLAND, INC. , XYZ COMPANIES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fermin Alarcon Sagastume, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73157
Petitioner:
FERMIN ALARCON SAGASTUME and EVELIN CAROLINA ALARCON VIDES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
