Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LY v. Adidas-Salomon AG et al
as 2:2022cv10624
Defendant:
iFit Health & Fitness, Adidas-Salomon AG, Reebok International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Lily Yonker, Robert Hover and LY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ware et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2019cv12688
Defendant:
Salomon Antonio Lopez Garcia and 1808396 Ontario Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Valdree Ware and Christopher Ware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sterling Commercial Credit, LLC v. Salomone
as 2:2019cv10401
Plaintiff:
Sterling Commercial Credit, LLC
Defendant:
Dan Salomone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatar v. Salamone et al
as 2:2019cv10331
Defendant:
James Pilchak, Deanna Warunek, Bill Schuette and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Tatar and John J Tatar [E-filer]
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Salomone v. Social Security
as 2:2018cv13972
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Marie Salomone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01243
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Salomon Sanchez Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Orum #417988 v. Rink et al
as 2:2018cv00158
Defendant:
M. McLean, Michael LaCrosse, D. Isard and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny D. Orum #417988
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iotova et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation, Altisource Solutions, Inc., Altisource Online Auction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Antoaneta Iotova and Issak Almaleh
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Cage v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2016cv11679
Plaintiff:
Harold Cage
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRETIONS, Heidi Washington and others
Salomon-Kresch v. Natl Life Ins Co
as 2:2015cv13130
Plaintiff:
Susan Salomon-Kresch
Defendant:
Natl Life Ins Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
