Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tyson Campbell v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1289
Petitioner:
TYSON TROY SAMUEL CAMPBELL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00678
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Tyson Troy Samuel Campbell
Respondent:
Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Tyson Troy Samuel CampbellIn re: Tyson Troy Samuel Campbell
as 23-1130
Petitioner:
In re: TYSON TROY SAMUEL CAMPBELL
Tyson Campbell v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1014
Petitioner:
TYSON TROY SAMUEL CAMPBELL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Samuel Marsh
as 17-80003
Respondent:
In re: SAMUEL CAMPBELL MARSH, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit October 25, 2011
Campbell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv25988
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Campbell and Samuel Campbell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, et al
as 1:1990cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter
Defendant:
Manuel Lujan , Eddie Brown , Marvin Pierce and others
Amicu:
Chugachmiut and Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Movant:
Klamath Tribes, Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon , Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Claimant:
Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon and Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Objector:
United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Class Counsel
Interpleader:
Alturas Indian Rancheria, Phillip Del Rosa , Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
