Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sutton v. Neighbors Credit Union
as 4:2025cv00751
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sutton
Defendant:
Neighbors Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Bean v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00892
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Michael Dwyer, Casey Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Knowles (Jones)
as 20-3698
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Kyle Ellison, Gerald Charles, AKA Twin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mark Jones, AKA Banger
Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SUTTON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01530
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUTTON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01531
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUTTON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01532
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Knowles (Rakeem Wilson)
as 14-2243
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rakeem Wilson
United States of America v. Knowles (Pegues)
as 14-558
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald Pegues, AKA Vegas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
