Cases 121 - 130 of 19,807
USA v. Ricky Sanchez
as 24-1625
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICKY SANCHEZ, a/k/a Rickie
SANCHEZ v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04565
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PENA et al v. DOOR2DOOR DETAILING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv04525
Plaintiff:
RAMON PENA and LUIS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DOOR2DOOR DETAILING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and WAYNE KRAWIEC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Campos-Sanchez
as 24-50249
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brayan Josue Campos-Sanchez
Sanchez la Torre, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2106
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ LA TORRE, YAQUELINE KRISTIMEN LIZA ALVAREZ, SABRINA AKIRA YACKELIN SANCHEZ LIZA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Menjivar v. Castro et al
as 0:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Christian Alberto Mendez Menjivar
Respondent:
Deisy Rosibel Enamorado Castro and Fredis Donain Montoya Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sanchez, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Samuel Sanchez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD.
as 1:2024cv21225
Plaintiff:
Oscar Sanchez
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD. doing business as Royal Caribbean Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
