Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jones v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rashane L. Jones
Defendant:
James Brown, R. Osteen, R. Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Markese Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eichel v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Eichel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Harold Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee, Bryan Herrion, Cedric Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Jackson
as 5:2018ct03308
Plaintiff:
Dewayne L. Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Jackson, Sgt. Fetty, Sgt. Bryant Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderlin v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2016ct03041
Plaintiff:
Norma Sanderlin
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence v. Greenland et al
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant:
Greenland, Leonard, Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERLIN v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv06990
Plaintiff:
ABDUL SANDERLIN
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLLEY et al v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv05013
Plaintiff:
SHARRIK S. MOLLEY, SHAWN BRAXTON, ABDUL SANDERLIN and others
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Lopez v. Phillip McDaniel, et al
as 11-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Lopez
Defendant - Appellee:
Phillip McDaniel, Sgt., Cummins Unit, ADC, Robert Sanderlin, Correctional Officer; Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Holmes, Correctional Officer, Cummins Unit, ADC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
