Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF/ D.O.N et al
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF/ D.O.N, OFFICER/CO HOOD, L.T. RICHARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGA RODRIGUEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
MR. CLARKE, FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MR. HOOD and others
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN VEGA RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McFadden et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Sand LNU, Tasha Young, Gary L. McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. Epicstream, LLC
as 5:2019cv00345
Plaintiff:
Steve Sands
Defendant:
Epicstream, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
REIVES v. TANADGUSIX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
KEISHA REIVES
Defendant:
TANADGUSIX CORPORATION , TDX GLOBAL, LLC , TDX POWER, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Perez v. Pretty Good Sand Company, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Pretty Good Sand Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs et al v. Ashe County et al
as 5:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. Combs and R. J. Combs
Defendant:
Ashe County, Judy Porter Poe, Larry Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINE BLUFF SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY v. PATTON INSTALLATIONS OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al
as 1:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
PINE BLUFF SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY
Defendant:
PATTON INSTALLATIONS OF FLORIDA, LLC and LINDSEY S. PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
