Cases 1 - 10 of 1,134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jaber v. Certified Luxury Motors et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff:
Nurul Amin Jaber
Defendant:
Certified Luxury Motors and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jaber v. Certified Luxury Motors et al
as 2:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Nurul Amin Jaber
Defendant:
Certified Luxury Motors and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. The Harrisburg Parking Authority et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Defendant:
The Harrisburg Parking Authority and Don's & Sons, Inc. doing business as Don's Towing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magee v. Santander Consumer USA
as 9:2024cv80417
Plaintiff:
Willneshia Taylor Magee
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Monk v. Santander Consumer USA
as 3:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Kevin Monk
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
