Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Farooque Ahmed v. BOP, et al
as 21-5134
Defendant / Appellee:
Ian Connors, Administrator, Nat'l Inmate Affairs, Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, Sara M. Revell, Res. Dir., N. Cent. Regional Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Farooque Ahmed
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Brnovich et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Rachel Chapa, JA Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clervrain v. Revell
as 21-3041
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Charles Woolsey v. William Wilson, et al
as 20-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. WOOLSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL, WILLIAM E. WILSON, CHRISTOPHER MCCOY and others
Noe v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2019cv02148
Defendant:
Kelly, B.O.P., Sara M. Revell and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Thomas Heyer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 19-7027
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, THOMAS R. KANE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, IKE EICHENLAUB, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PAUL BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HEYER
AHMED v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv01189
Defendant:
FRANK LARA, IAN CONNORS, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Clervrain v. Revell
as 19-3067
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
