Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PARIS v. LAMIA et al
as 2:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. PARIS doing business as MORRIS, PARIS & ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
ANTHONY LAMIA, JR., KRISTIN ROBBINS, SARAH JONES and others
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00761
Plaintiff:
Jones, Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Reed v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv03079
Defendant:
Sarah Jones, Angela M. Franz and Toby Smith
Plaintiff:
I: a woman and Kayla Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy Smith, et al v. City of Austin, et al
as 20-50197
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGARET MOORE, Travis County District Attorney, TRAVIS COUNTY, ART ACEVEDO, Former Austin Police Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA FIELDING, JULIE ANN NITSCH, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, EMILY BORCHARDT and others
Jeffrey Maurer v. Sarah Jones
as 19-5080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY J. MAURER
Defendant / Appellant:
SARAH JONES
Delvon C. Jackson v. Sarah Jones et al
as 2:2017cv07843
Plaintiff:
Delvon C. Jackson
Defendant:
Sarah Jones and Los Angeles County
Antonio Duscio, et al v. Al Hill, et al
as 17-13651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DUSCIO, TINA COLEMAN, THOMAS KELLY COLEMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AL B. HILL
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Jones v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as MN/0:13-cv-02018
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jones
Defendant:
Merck & Co. , Inc. , Organon USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jones et al v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv13223
Plaintiff:
La Falle Jones and Sarah Jones
Defendant:
Option One Mortgage Corporation, Trott & Trott, Wayne County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
