Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Salgado v. Aitken et al
as 3:2020cv02319
Petitioner:
Armando Nunez Salgado
Respondent:
Warden, Loretta Lynch, Timothy S. Aitken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
IBRAHIM v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00126
Petitioner:
JAMAL IBRAHIM
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN SMITH, THOMAS R. DECKER, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thervil v. Saldana
as 5:2017cv00265
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Sarah R. Saldana
Petitioner:
Pouchon Thervil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03093
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-20803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Lal Bhatia v. USA, et al
as 16-60076
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, an entity, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Harjit Singh v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al
as 16-1017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARJIT SINGH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, THOMAS DECKER, Philadelphia Office, USICE, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Yao v. Aiken et al.
as 2:2015cv02696
Petitioner:
Li Guo Yao
Respondent:
Timothy S. Aiken , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Sarah R. Saldana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
