Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Choumas Produce Co., Inc. v. Academy Fruit Sales, LLC, et al.
as 1:2018cv00457
Plaintiff:
Choumas Produce Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Academy Fruit Sales, LLP, Jayson Paul T. Scarborough and Gary Dean Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Scarborough v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2018cv00048
Petitioner:
Joshua P. Scarborough
Respondent:
State of Montana and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salma Agha-Khan v. USA, et al
as 17-56842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D., an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern District of California, FREDERICK CLEMENT, US Bankruptcy Judge and others
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vanessa Garcia v. Scarborough Research, et al
as 2:2017cv00537
Defendant:
Does and Scarborough Research
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Garcia
Sexton v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2016cv02144
Plaintiff:
Carl R Sexton
Defendant:
Peoria, City of , Roy Minter , Unknown Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAK Trademarks LLC v. Dr Teemu J Scarborough DDS PC et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
RAK Trademarks LLC
Defendant:
Teemu J Scarborough DDS PC, Teemu J Scarborough PC and Teemu J Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bifford L Scarborough, Jr v. Thomas Elliott et al
as 2:2015cv09755
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, Thomas Elliott and Spoon Singh
Plaintiff:
Bifford L Scarborough, Jr
Scarborough v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015at00081
Plaintiff:
Renee G. Scarborough
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
