Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SCOTT BLAKE v. TJX COMPANIES
as 2:2023cv05083
Plaintiff:
TRACY SCOTT BLAKE
Defendant:
TJX COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEBBLAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Mr. JOSEPHUS NYON DEBBLAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bryant Scott Blake
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Champion Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BLAKE v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07705
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BLAKE
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
