Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman v. The Perry News
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Coleman
Defendant:
The Perry News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11657
Plaintiff:
Scott Coleman
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coleman v. Staunton Police Department
as 7:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Scott Coleman
Defendant:
Staunton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RPM Care, LLC et al v. StreetDivvy Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02538
Plaintiff:
RPM Care, LLC, Ashley Pace and Scott Coleman
Defendant:
StreetDivvy Inc. and Joshua Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11196
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35845
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCOTT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Devon Coleman
as 20-4093
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVON SCOTT COLEMAN, a/k/a Cuz, a/k/a Devin Scott Coleman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
USA v. Coleman et al
as 2:2019cv00338
Defendant:
Midland Funding, John Scott Coleman, Nationstar Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
