Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
HANCOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49967
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HANCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock v. Lynchburg City Schools/Lynchburg City School Board
as 6:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Lynchburg City Schools | Lynchburg City School Board and Lynchburg City Schools / Lynchburg City School Board
Plaintiff:
Twanna Scott Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mitchell v. Hancock et al
as 3:2018cv03418
Defendant:
Ralph K Garrett, Scott Hancock, Calvert K Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hancock et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) et al
as 3:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and William B. Long
Plaintiff:
Desiree Hancock and Scott Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Jeffrey Hancock v. Warden
as 15-13166
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT HANCOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Hancock v. Jones
as 1:2014cv00579
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Hancock
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hancock et al v. Fashion Carpets, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02278
Plaintiff:
Scott Hancock , David Servick , Forrest Tucker and others
Defendant:
Fashion Carpets Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHAMP v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
SEAN PHILLIP CHAMP
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER LANDRUM, KENNETH S TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite et al v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilhite , James Acuna , Christian Admire and others
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corporation and L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
