Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22319
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN P MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00472
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Sean T Mitchell and Sean Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. Myrick et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, John Myrick and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Myrick
as 2:2015cv01189
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Myrick
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CREED v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2013cv00927
Plaintiff:
SEAN CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CREED
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S. SAUNDERS and SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREED v. MOUNT AIRY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00919
Plaintiff:
SEAN CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CREED
Defendant:
MOUNT AIRY POLICE DEPARTMENT, RYAN BENNETT and REEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREED v. MOUNT AIRY NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
SEAN CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CREED
Defendant:
MOUNT AIRY NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, REEVES and RYAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Patrick Mitchell v. James Yates
as 2:2010cv08491
Petitioner:
Sean Patrick Mitchell
Respondent:
James Yates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
