Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mitchell et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03532
Plaintiff:
Ondrey Mitchell, Achorea Tisdale, Adam Link and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Haljuci v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al
as 1:2026cv01424
Plaintiff:
Mergim Haljuci
Defendant:
Sean McCormack, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hadassah Feinberg v. Ferdinand Cintron, Jr., et al
as 24-3009
Defendant:
FERDINAND CINTRON, JR., ROSA CRUZ, ALYSSA SCHATZ and others
Plaintiff:
HADASSAH FEINBERG
Hadassah Feinberg v. Ferdinand Cintron, Jr.
as 24-1794
Defendant:
GABI WILLIAMS, CHRISTIAN RIBEC, SALLY LUPINI and others
Plaintiff:
HADASSAH FEINBERG
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01377
Defendant:
Lee Ann Tarasi, Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01957
Defendant:
Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson, Vincent Paese and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zito v. Gettle et al
as 1:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Charles Zito
Defendant:
Jennifer Gettle, Sean McCormack, Stefanie Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Bryan Kauffman, RisMiller Law Group, LLC, Judge Richard Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
