Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Tulowitzky v. Burley et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Tulowitzky
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, C/O White, C/O Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
CARPENTER v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
SUZANNE SENNETT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sullins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Timothy Radcliff, Perry Phelps, Phil Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Sullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adger et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crumpler, Antoine Jones, Eugene W. Wiggins and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Frederick, Lt. Justin Atherholt, Governor John Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
