Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bowman v. Anderson et al
as 9:2021cv02684
Plaintiff:
Richard F.V. Bowman, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Anderson, Lt. Moss and Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeGendre v. Joseph et al
as 7:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Martin Kumer, Officer White, Lieutenant Boggs and others
Plaintiff:
Jowell Travis LeGendre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dizzley v. Pate et al
as 8:2019cv02665
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Officer Brown, Off Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Bennett et al
as 9:2018cv00819
Plaintiff:
Glen Strickland, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Bennett, Sgt Creel, Sgt Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton et al v. Crookshank et al
as 3:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Anita J. Shelton and Immogene Williams Daniels
Defendant:
Robert Blane Crookshank, Andre Maltavo, The Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. South Carolina Department of Corr et al
as 5:2015cv03608
Plaintiff:
ZayQuane Jackson
Defendant:
B Stirling, Michael McCall, Warden Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 5:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shannon Johnson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center, Scott Bodiford, Lt Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-7254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
Titus Thomas v. Officer Allgood
as 11-6105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ALLGOOD, OFFICER VINE, GEORGE T. GREGORY, Hearing Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
