Cases 51 - 60 of 115
ECHOLS v. CLARKE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
RECO BERNARD ECHOLS
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JESSICA GOINGS, SGT PERKINS, CLARKE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Z. Garcia v. Jeffery Andrew et al
as 2:2018cv08198
Defendant:
Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Eller, Deputy Glasper and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Z. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Gildea et al
as 3:2018cv01527
Defendant:
P.A. Eric, P.A. Gonnes, CO Sposito and others
Plaintiff:
Gartor Kiki Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kersten et al
as 3:2018cv01436
Defendant:
State's Attorney Bloodworth, Cpl. Swift, Mr. Brashears and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Annucci
as 18-1145
Defendant:
Borrough, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Tier Hearing Officer Zerniak, P. Drumm, Video Officer and others
Appellee:
Locke, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Donald Uhler, Superintendent, Captain Bishop, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
Wilson v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Daryl Wilson
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jah'keem Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dannel M. Mitchell
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Charles Peck, Craig Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Peyton, IV v. John Walrach
as 17-7434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WALRACH, Warden, HENRY PONTON, Regional Director, B. L. KANODE, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
