Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shannon Simmons, et al v. Futo's, Inc., et al
as 23-12046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON SIMMONS and ERANUS ROBERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FUTO'S, INC. and NOMAN RASHID
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Simmons et al v. Futo's, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03591
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons and Eranus Roberson
Defendant:
Futo's, Inc., Steve (John) Futo, Charles Futo and others
SIMMONS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SIMMONS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Stage Ten Atlanta, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Defendant:
Stage Ten Atlanta, Inc. and Courtney Bailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Simmons v. Ford et al
as 5:2013cv00078
Defendant:
Donny Ford, Michael Parnell, Tony Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Singleton et al
as 1:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Defendant:
Judge Singleton, Mark Klappenbach and Ian Vickery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Ford et al
as 1:2013cv01020
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Defendant:
Donny Ford, Tommy Stringfellow, Joe Vedta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Norwood et al
as 1:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Defendant:
David Norwood, Doug Woods, Andrew Tollerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Nevens et al
as 2:2010cv01272
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevens
Petitioner:
Shannon Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. City of Maplewood et al
as 4:2009cv00788
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simmons
Defendant:
City of Maplewood, Martin Corcoran, Anthony Traxler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
