Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bailey v. AFAM Concept, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv07729
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bailey
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAILEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00070
Petitioner:
SHARON BAILEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Sharon Bailey v. Board of Regents of University
as 21-11225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, d.b.a. Clayton State University
Gray v. Mott et al
as 2:2019cv01562
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Co, Lyft Inc and Sharon Bailey Mott
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vanessa Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2017cv01580
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R Cooper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Wachington-Adduci, Richard Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanessa Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2017cv05138
Defendant:
Sharon Bailey, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Richard Griffen and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Cooper
La Thi Hoang v. Douglas Stern et al
as 2:2017cv05096
Defendant:
Sharon Bailey, Raymond Barragan, Charlie Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Lan Thi Hoang
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
