Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharon Black, et al v. Lorenza Patrick, et al
as 16-11592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON E. BLACK and ROBERT E. BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
LORENZA PATRICK, WILLIAM H. HARRIS, Dr.; Previous President of Alabama State University, JOHN F. KNIGHT, JR., CFO Alabama State University and others
Burgess v. RBEY Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00625
Defendant:
Sharon E. Brown, Christopher R. Fredrich, RBEY Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Horace Gozon Friend v. James G. Carr et al
as 5:2015cv00975
Defendant:
Jane C Arellano, Marsha S Berzon, Eli W Bizic and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Gozon Friend
Amicu:
United States of America
Horace Gozan Friend v. Mr. Eli W. Bisic et al
as 5:2015cv00977
Defendant:
Jane C Arellano, Marsha S Berzon, Eli W Bisic and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Gozon Friend
Amicu:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PURDIE et al v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv06639
Plaintiff:
RONALD PURDIE , RAGIB WITHERSPOON and JAMES FANNINGS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blacksmith Multi-Media, Inc. et al v. The State of Alabama et al(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00651
Plaintiff:
Blacksmith Multi-Media, Inc., Sharon E. Black and Robert E. Black
Defendant:
The State of Alabama, UA-ASU-TSU Educational Public Radio, Alabama Educational Television Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
