Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Paul Lietz, et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al
as 23-35603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL LIETZ
Plaintiff:
SAKAHANN OUCH, VUTHA REN and L. S., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, COLIN FINE, Special Agent, in his personal and/or official capacity, DAVID CLYDE, Special Agent, in his personal and/or official capacity and others
Defendant:
CANYON COUNTY, CANYON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARY SALAZAR and others
US v. Jamar Parker
as 23-6741
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAR KE-SHAWN PARKER
Morgan v. Morgan-Parker et al
as 2:2022cv05393
Plaintiff:
Charles Ross Morgan and Charles-Ross Morgan
Defendant:
Ashley Nacole Mayeaux Morgan-Parker, Brian Gerard Mayeaux, Ronnie Shawn Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Lietz, et al. v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al.
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Paul Lietz, Sakahann Ouch, Vutha Ren and others
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, SA Colin Fine, SA David Clyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Parker
as 1:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Shawn Parker
Defendant:
Justin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parker v. USA
as 7:2021cv00212
Petitioner:
Jamar Ke-Shawn Parker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. Broxton
as 21-50883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Heather Broxton
US v. Jamar Parker
as 21-6897
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAR KE-SHAWN PARKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parker v. Ware et al
as 6:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
Shawn Parker
Defendant:
Charles Ware, Christopher Casson and Warden FNU Alsobrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04968
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
