Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Price v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Dustin Shawn Price
Respondent:
Warden Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeremy Smallwood v. Shawn Price
as 23-6795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY SMALLWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN PRICE, SGT. ELLIOT and SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY
Chukwurah v. Price et al
as 5:2023cv00333
Petitioner:
David Bryan Emeka Chukwurah
Respondent:
Shawn Price and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Shawn Price
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, Major Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gourneau et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Spotted Bear, Jordan Gunderson, Dennis G. Nash and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PRICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61294
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Price et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2016cv09694
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H Price and Shawn Price
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beard v. Patton, et al
as 16-5019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL BEARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PATTON, Director, JANET DOWLING, Warden, CARL BEAR, Deputy Warden and others
Beard v. Patton et al
as 4:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
David Earl Beard
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Janet Dowling, Carl Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
