Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Cephas et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cephas , Jamie Albert , Solange Cole and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Allen v. Allen et al
as 1:2014cv04126
Plaintiff:
Shay Lamont Allen
Defendant:
Allen, Janet Singleton and Jeffrey Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Nielsen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07154
Plaintiff:
Shay Nielsen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrante et al v. Middlesex County, VA
as 1:2013cv00865
Plaintiff:
Guy Ferrante and Deborah Shay Ferrante
Defendant:
Middlesex County, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Cox v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15388
Plaintiff:
Mindy Shay Cox
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Caldera Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shay et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv15241
Plaintiff:
Desiree Goggins Shay and Michael Shay
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berglind et al v. White et al
as 9:2012cv01992
Plaintiff:
Erin T Berglind and Mark S Berglind
Defendant:
Derrick White , Debra Goyer , Shay Massing and others
Counter_claimant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc , Green Tree Servicing LLC and MERS Inc
Counter_defendant:
Erin T Berglind and Mark S Berglind
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
